HERBERT HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

145

30%

LEVEL 2

215

44%

LEVEL 3

96

20%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

66

25%

LEVEL 2

112

43%

LEVEL 3

62

24%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

69

28%

LEVEL 2

111

45%

LEVEL 3

47

19%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

32

29%

LEVEL 2

46

42%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

76

32%

LEVEL 2

104

43%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

34

22%

LEVEL 2

66

43%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

100

25%

LEVEL 2

185

47%

LEVEL 3

80

20%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

37

19%

LEVEL 2

90

45%

LEVEL 3

52

26%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

21

54%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

16

48%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

83

21%

LEVEL 2

189

49%

LEVEL 3

88

23%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

34

17%

LEVEL 2

93

46%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

62

64%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

32

54%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

124
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

142

30%

LEVEL 2

213

44%

LEVEL 3

96

20%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

110

45%

LEVEL 3

62

25%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

21

16%

LEVEL 2

53

39%

LEVEL 3

41

30%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

95

40%

LEVEL 2

105

44%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

45

36%

LEVEL 2

59

47%

LEVEL 3

21

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.