Skip to Content
Main content

ORCHARD PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

424
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 912

LEVEL 1

121

13%

LEVEL 2

367

40%

LEVEL 3

287

31%

LEVEL 4

137

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

284
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 590

LEVEL 1

71

12%

LEVEL 2

235

40%

LEVEL 3

181

31%

LEVEL 4

103

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

196
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

57

13%

LEVEL 2

191

43%

LEVEL 3

132

30%

LEVEL 4

64

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

38

13%

LEVEL 2

115

39%

LEVEL 3

93

32%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

228
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

64

14%

LEVEL 2

176

38%

LEVEL 3

155

33%

LEVEL 4

73

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

144
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

120

40%

LEVEL 3

88

30%

LEVEL 4

56

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

399
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 846

LEVEL 1

109

13%

LEVEL 2

338

40%

LEVEL 3

271

32%

LEVEL 4

128

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

266
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

62

11%

LEVEL 2

213

39%

LEVEL 3

169

31%

LEVEL 4

97

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

8

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

412
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 787

LEVEL 1

54

7%

LEVEL 2

321

41%

LEVEL 3

276

35%

LEVEL 4

136

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

25

5%

LEVEL 2

204

40%

LEVEL 3

178

35%

LEVEL 4

102

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

67

54%

LEVEL 2

46

37%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

46

57%

LEVEL 2

31

38%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

400
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 812

LEVEL 1

92

11%

LEVEL 2

320

39%

LEVEL 3

267

33%

LEVEL 4

133

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

272
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

52

10%

LEVEL 2

212

40%

LEVEL 3

170

32%

LEVEL 4

102

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

29

29%

LEVEL 2

47

47%

LEVEL 3

20

20%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

19

35%

LEVEL 2

23

43%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.