TONAWANDA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

137

23%

LEVEL 2

227

38%

LEVEL 3

151

26%

LEVEL 4

77

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

92

24%

LEVEL 2

130

34%

LEVEL 3

96

25%

LEVEL 4

66

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

61

21%

LEVEL 2

115

39%

LEVEL 3

73

25%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

45

25%

LEVEL 4

34

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

76

26%

LEVEL 2

112

38%

LEVEL 3

78

26%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

48

24%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

32

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

216
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

115

21%

LEVEL 2

206

38%

LEVEL 3

140

26%

LEVEL 4

76

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

152
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

78

22%

LEVEL 2

118

34%

LEVEL 3

89

26%

LEVEL 4

63

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

87

17%

LEVEL 2

209

40%

LEVEL 3

148

28%

LEVEL 4

77

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

95

29%

LEVEL 4

66

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

50

70%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

45

78%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

112

38%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

46

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

60

35%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

39

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

89

30%

LEVEL 2

115

38%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

63

29%

LEVEL 2

70

33%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.