AKRON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

292
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 654

LEVEL 1

131

20%

LEVEL 2

231

35%

LEVEL 3

185

28%

LEVEL 4

107

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

70

19%

LEVEL 2

127

34%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

68

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

158
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

52

16%

LEVEL 2

124

37%

LEVEL 3

98

29%

LEVEL 4

60

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

38

20%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

55

29%

LEVEL 4

32

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

79

25%

LEVEL 2

107

33%

LEVEL 3

87

27%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

32

17%

LEVEL 2

60

33%

LEVEL 3

56

30%

LEVEL 4

36

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

28

34%

LEVEL 2

42

51%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

24

47%

LEVEL 2

21

41%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

272
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

100

18%

LEVEL 2

184

33%

LEVEL 3

172

31%

LEVEL 4

100

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

168
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

101

32%

LEVEL 4

67

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

77

13%

LEVEL 2

216

37%

LEVEL 3

180

31%

LEVEL 4

106

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

39

12%

LEVEL 2

121

36%

LEVEL 3

107

32%

LEVEL 4

68

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

54

72%

LEVEL 2

15

20%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

31

76%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

227
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

63

14%

LEVEL 2

145

33%

LEVEL 3

142

33%

LEVEL 4

85

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

73

32%

LEVEL 3

83

36%

LEVEL 4

53

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

68

31%

LEVEL 2

86

39%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

48

33%

LEVEL 2

54

37%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.