Skip to Content
Main content

LANCASTER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

146

23%

LEVEL 2

299

47%

LEVEL 3

155

24%

LEVEL 4

41

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

61

18%

LEVEL 2

153

45%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

66

23%

LEVEL 2

127

45%

LEVEL 3

72

26%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

70

46%

LEVEL 3

47

31%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

80

22%

LEVEL 2

172

48%

LEVEL 3

83

23%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

38

20%

LEVEL 2

83

44%

LEVEL 3

56

30%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

191
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

129

21%

LEVEL 2

282

47%

LEVEL 3

150

25%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

57

18%

LEVEL 2

140

44%

LEVEL 3

101

32%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

9

47%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

97

18%

LEVEL 2

260

47%

LEVEL 3

151

28%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

127

46%

LEVEL 3

95

35%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

49

53%

LEVEL 2

39

42%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

32

48%

LEVEL 2

26

39%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

186
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

105

20%

LEVEL 2

239

45%

LEVEL 3

146

28%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

127

46%

LEVEL 3

92

33%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

41

37%

LEVEL 2

60

54%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

24

39%

LEVEL 2

26

42%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.