Skip to Content
Main content

HAMBURG CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

635
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,284

LEVEL 1

152

12%

LEVEL 2

497

39%

LEVEL 3

421

33%

LEVEL 4

214

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

394
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 723

LEVEL 1

103

14%

LEVEL 2

226

31%

LEVEL 3

224

31%

LEVEL 4

170

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

315
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

79

12%

LEVEL 2

245

38%

LEVEL 3

204

32%

LEVEL 4

111

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

200
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

119

34%

LEVEL 3

113

32%

LEVEL 4

87

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

320
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 645

LEVEL 1

73

11%

LEVEL 2

252

39%

LEVEL 3

217

34%

LEVEL 4

103

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

194
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

67

18%

LEVEL 2

107

29%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

83

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

5

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

604
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,222

LEVEL 1

137

11%

LEVEL 2

481

39%

LEVEL 3

399

33%

LEVEL 4

205

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

366
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 667

LEVEL 1

92

14%

LEVEL 2

209

31%

LEVEL 3

206

31%

LEVEL 4

160

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

6

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

610
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,130

LEVEL 1

78

7%

LEVEL 2

442

39%

LEVEL 3

401

35%

LEVEL 4

209

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

384
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 635

LEVEL 1

45

7%

LEVEL 2

206

32%

LEVEL 3

217

34%

LEVEL 4

167

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

74

48%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

58

66%

LEVEL 2

20

23%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

601
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,175

LEVEL 1

133

11%

LEVEL 2

441

38%

LEVEL 3

400

34%

LEVEL 4

201

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

342
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

62

11%

LEVEL 2

181

31%

LEVEL 3

187

32%

LEVEL 4

155

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

19

17%

LEVEL 2

56

51%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

41

30%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.