Skip to Content
Main content

HUTH ROAD SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

124

37%

LEVEL 3

93

28%

LEVEL 4

74

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

82

38%

LEVEL 4

47

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

62

37%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

35

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

11

11%

LEVEL 2

32

31%

LEVEL 3

37

36%

LEVEL 4

22

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

39

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

27

24%

LEVEL 3

45

40%

LEVEL 4

25

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

113

37%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

68

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

116
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

48

26%

LEVEL 3

73

40%

LEVEL 4

43

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

115

38%

LEVEL 3

89

29%

LEVEL 4

72

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

78

40%

LEVEL 4

46

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

18

55%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

166
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

120

36%

LEVEL 3

92

28%

LEVEL 4

74

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

127
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

80

38%

LEVEL 4

47

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

103

37%

LEVEL 3

76

27%

LEVEL 4

70

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

65

39%

LEVEL 4

44

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

14

25%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

10

21%

LEVEL 2

17

36%

LEVEL 3

17

36%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.