KAEGEBEIN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

61

21%

LEVEL 2

117

40%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

41

22%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

64

34%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

26

17%

LEVEL 2

67

43%

LEVEL 3

44

28%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

20

22%

LEVEL 2

27

29%

LEVEL 3

33

35%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

35

25%

LEVEL 2

50

36%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

21

22%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

31

32%

LEVEL 4

15

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

49

18%

LEVEL 2

105

40%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

35

21%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

56

34%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

103

41%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

48

30%

LEVEL 3

61

38%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

26

62%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

19

63%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

63

30%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

20

16%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

47

36%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

20

24%

LEVEL 2

41

48%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

21

35%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.