Skip to Content
Main content

IROQUOIS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

40

11%

LEVEL 2

133

36%

LEVEL 3

139

37%

LEVEL 4

60

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

58

33%

LEVEL 4

41

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

75

40%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

9

11%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

31

36%

LEVEL 4

19

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

70

38%

LEVEL 3

64

35%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

27

29%

LEVEL 4

22

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

189
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

128

36%

LEVEL 3

131

37%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

57

35%

LEVEL 3

53

32%

LEVEL 4

39

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

134

41%

LEVEL 4

59

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

53

34%

LEVEL 3

58

37%

LEVEL 4

41

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

25

51%

LEVEL 2

18

37%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

13

65%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

26

8%

LEVEL 2

109

35%

LEVEL 3

126

40%

LEVEL 4

54

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

52

37%

LEVEL 4

36

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

14

25%

LEVEL 2

24

42%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

9

25%

LEVEL 2

16

44%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.