IROQUOIS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

387
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 780

LEVEL 1

112

14%

LEVEL 2

281

36%

LEVEL 3

255

33%

LEVEL 4

132

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

54

13%

LEVEL 2

136

32%

LEVEL 3

132

31%

LEVEL 4

101

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

193
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

48

12%

LEVEL 2

144

37%

LEVEL 3

129

34%

LEVEL 4

64

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

64

32%

LEVEL 4

44

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

194
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

137

35%

LEVEL 3

126

32%

LEVEL 4

68

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

69

31%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

57

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

6

38%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

364
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 735

LEVEL 1

105

14%

LEVEL 2

266

36%

LEVEL 3

240

33%

LEVEL 4

124

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

218
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

127

32%

LEVEL 3

121

31%

LEVEL 4

97

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

377
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 677

LEVEL 1

51

8%

LEVEL 2

249

37%

LEVEL 3

248

37%

LEVEL 4

129

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

117

32%

LEVEL 3

127

35%

LEVEL 4

97

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

61

59%

LEVEL 2

32

31%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

30

52%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

350
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 647

LEVEL 1

71

11%

LEVEL 2

226

35%

LEVEL 3

229

35%

LEVEL 4

121

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

206
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

100

30%

LEVEL 3

115

34%

LEVEL 4

91

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

41

31%

LEVEL 2

55

41%

LEVEL 3

26

20%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

24

28%

LEVEL 2

36

41%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.