Skip to Content
Main content

LEDGEVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

30

11%

LEVEL 3

94

36%

LEVEL 4

131

50%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

29

14%

LEVEL 3

72

35%

LEVEL 4

100

49%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

17

12%

LEVEL 3

57

40%

LEVEL 4

64

45%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

32

32%

LEVEL 4

52

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

13

11%

LEVEL 3

37

31%

LEVEL 4

67

56%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

14

13%

LEVEL 3

40

38%

LEVEL 4

48

46%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

8

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

26

11%

LEVEL 3

85

36%

LEVEL 4

121

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

156
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

21

12%

LEVEL 3

65

36%

LEVEL 4

91

51%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

26

11%

LEVEL 3

89

36%

LEVEL 4

129

52%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

22

11%

LEVEL 3

72

37%

LEVEL 4

98

51%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

7

64%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

212
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

27

11%

LEVEL 3

85

35%

LEVEL 4

127

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

27

14%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

96

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

9

50%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.