CLARENCE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

471
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 969

LEVEL 1

153

16%

LEVEL 2

345

36%

LEVEL 3

307

32%

LEVEL 4

164

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

367
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

71

11%

LEVEL 2

190

30%

LEVEL 3

223

36%

LEVEL 4

144

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

221
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

59

13%

LEVEL 2

176

39%

LEVEL 3

146

32%

LEVEL 4

75

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

193
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

102

32%

LEVEL 3

121

38%

LEVEL 4

72

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

250
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

94

18%

LEVEL 2

169

33%

LEVEL 3

161

31%

LEVEL 4

89

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

174
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

51

16%

LEVEL 2

88

28%

LEVEL 3

102

33%

LEVEL 4

72

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

17

45%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

14

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

424
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 881

LEVEL 1

134

15%

LEVEL 2

323

37%

LEVEL 3

282

32%

LEVEL 4

142

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

331
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

55

10%

LEVEL 2

172

31%

LEVEL 3

204

37%

LEVEL 4

127

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

9

45%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

463
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 833

LEVEL 1

69

8%

LEVEL 2

301

36%

LEVEL 3

301

36%

LEVEL 4

162

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

356
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

35

6%

LEVEL 2

172

31%

LEVEL 3

214

38%

LEVEL 4

142

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

84

62%

LEVEL 2

44

32%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

36

55%

LEVEL 2

18

28%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

441
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 866

LEVEL 1

118

14%

LEVEL 2

307

35%

LEVEL 3

284

33%

LEVEL 4

157

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

340
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

58

10%

LEVEL 2

168

30%

LEVEL 3

203

36%

LEVEL 4

137

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

35

34%

LEVEL 2

38

37%

LEVEL 3

23

22%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

13

21%

LEVEL 2

22

35%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.