Skip to Content
Main content

WOODROW WILSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

95

33%

LEVEL 2

109

38%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

51

26%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

43

33%

LEVEL 2

57

44%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

17

19%

LEVEL 2

35

38%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

19

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

52

33%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

37

23%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

34

33%

LEVEL 2

28

27%

LEVEL 3

31

30%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

72

29%

LEVEL 2

99

40%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

40

24%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

12

57%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

94

41%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

32

20%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

47

29%

LEVEL 4

29

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

39

67%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

19

58%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

23

19%

LEVEL 2

47

39%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

19

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

14

18%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

26

34%

LEVEL 4

16

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

72

42%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

37

32%

LEVEL 2

42

36%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.