CAYUGA HTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

84

22%

LEVEL 2

107

28%

LEVEL 3

125

33%

LEVEL 4

60

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

49

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

39

22%

LEVEL 2

49

27%

LEVEL 3

57

32%

LEVEL 4

34

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

30

33%

LEVEL 3

27

29%

LEVEL 4

25

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

68

35%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

16

16%

LEVEL 2

34

34%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

24

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

163
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

71

22%

LEVEL 2

95

29%

LEVEL 3

111

34%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

22

13%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

44

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

50

15%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

122

37%

LEVEL 4

58

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

54

32%

LEVEL 4

47

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

34

71%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

16

70%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

182
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

81

22%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

123

33%

LEVEL 4

59

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

34

16%

LEVEL 2

55

26%

LEVEL 3

81

39%

LEVEL 4

40

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

36

33%

LEVEL 3

33

30%

LEVEL 4

35

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

50

30%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

20

24%

LEVEL 2

28

34%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

14

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.