Skip to Content
Main content

CLEVELAND HILL UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 591

LEVEL 1

161

27%

LEVEL 2

231

39%

LEVEL 3

139

24%

LEVEL 4

60

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

162

31%

LEVEL 2

177

34%

LEVEL 3

107

21%

LEVEL 4

70

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

79

28%

LEVEL 2

110

39%

LEVEL 3

65

23%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

74

29%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

82

27%

LEVEL 2

121

40%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

88

34%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

54

21%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

17

39%

LEVEL 2

19

43%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

13

39%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

139
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

60

18%

LEVEL 2

127

39%

LEVEL 3

91

28%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

120
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

55

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

69

39%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

83

47%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

14

38%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

14

45%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

94

19%

LEVEL 2

211

43%

LEVEL 3

131

26%

LEVEL 4

60

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

101

23%

LEVEL 2

163

37%

LEVEL 3

104

24%

LEVEL 4

69

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

67

71%

LEVEL 2

20

21%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

61

77%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

175
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

161

32%

LEVEL 2

175

34%

LEVEL 3

105

21%

LEVEL 4

70

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

43

18%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

74

31%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

49

23%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

44

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

118

34%

LEVEL 2

145

42%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

113

37%

LEVEL 2

111

36%

LEVEL 3

56

18%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.