Skip to Content
Main content

PFC WILLIAM J GRABIARZ #79 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

125

39%

LEVEL 2

94

29%

LEVEL 3

56

17%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

91

33%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

50

30%

LEVEL 2

51

31%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

41

28%

LEVEL 2

48

33%

LEVEL 3

30

21%

LEVEL 4

26

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

75

47%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

19

12%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

50

38%

LEVEL 2

29

22%

LEVEL 3

36

27%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

7

35%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

28
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

31

38%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

17

21%

LEVEL 4

11

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

16

25%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

19

30%

LEVEL 4

14

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

35
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

52

39%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

41

34%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

30

39%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

13

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

22

39%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

60

26%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

45

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

41

21%

LEVEL 2

68

34%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

39

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

65

70%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

50

64%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

106
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

89

33%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

24

50%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

15

39%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

101

37%

LEVEL 2

82

30%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

76

32%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

56

23%

LEVEL 4

40

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.