Skip to Content
Main content

BENNETT PARK MONTESSORI SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 622

LEVEL 1

377

61%

LEVEL 2

193

31%

LEVEL 3

43

7%

LEVEL 4

9

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

19
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

219

73%

LEVEL 2

63

21%

LEVEL 3

18

6%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

184

60%

LEVEL 2

92

30%

LEVEL 3

24

8%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

87

65%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

193

61%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

19

6%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

132

79%

LEVEL 2

30

18%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

5

83%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

37

52%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

33

63%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

309

63%

LEVEL 2

146

30%

LEVEL 3

29

6%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

163

77%

LEVEL 2

39

18%

LEVEL 3

10

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

17

49%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

13

76%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

254

54%

LEVEL 2

171

36%

LEVEL 3

40

8%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

18
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

116

62%

LEVEL 2

54

29%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

123

83%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

103

91%

LEVEL 2

9

8%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

76

48%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

38

58%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

301

65%

LEVEL 2

132

28%

LEVEL 3

28

6%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

181

77%

LEVEL 2

43

18%

LEVEL 3

12

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.