Skip to Content
Main content

RHINEBECK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

85

18%

LEVEL 2

181

39%

LEVEL 3

132

28%

LEVEL 4

69

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

76

20%

LEVEL 2

125

33%

LEVEL 3

122

32%

LEVEL 4

57

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

87

40%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

32

18%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

49

20%

LEVEL 2

94

38%

LEVEL 3

67

27%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

44

21%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

182
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

73

17%

LEVEL 2

163

39%

LEVEL 3

120

29%

LEVEL 4

62

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

63

19%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

113

33%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

7

26%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

49

12%

LEVEL 2

163

40%

LEVEL 3

129

31%

LEVEL 4

69

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

46

13%

LEVEL 2

119

35%

LEVEL 3

120

35%

LEVEL 4

57

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

36

63%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

30

79%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

52

14%

LEVEL 2

144

38%

LEVEL 3

117

31%

LEVEL 4

62

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

54

17%

LEVEL 2

103

33%

LEVEL 3

105

33%

LEVEL 4

54

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

33

36%

LEVEL 2

37

40%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

22

34%

LEVEL 2

22

34%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.