Skip to Content
Main content

RED HOOK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

355
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 750

LEVEL 1

139

19%

LEVEL 2

256

34%

LEVEL 3

221

29%

LEVEL 4

134

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

270
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

82

16%

LEVEL 2

174

33%

LEVEL 3

165

31%

LEVEL 4

105

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

170
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

68

18%

LEVEL 2

142

37%

LEVEL 3

107

28%

LEVEL 4

63

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

78

32%

LEVEL 3

82

33%

LEVEL 4

52

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

185
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

71

19%

LEVEL 2

114

31%

LEVEL 3

114

31%

LEVEL 4

71

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

48

17%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

83

30%

LEVEL 4

53

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

8

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

314
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

112

17%

LEVEL 2

229

35%

LEVEL 3

194

30%

LEVEL 4

120

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

232
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

66

15%

LEVEL 2

155

34%

LEVEL 3

143

32%

LEVEL 4

89

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

18

35%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

10

24%

LEVEL 2

13

32%

LEVEL 3

13

32%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

349
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 658

LEVEL 1

67

10%

LEVEL 2

242

37%

LEVEL 3

218

33%

LEVEL 4

131

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

158

35%

LEVEL 3

160

36%

LEVEL 4

104

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

72

78%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

55

71%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

351
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 734

LEVEL 1

131

18%

LEVEL 2

252

34%

LEVEL 3

217

30%

LEVEL 4

134

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

268
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

78

15%

LEVEL 2

169

33%

LEVEL 3

164

32%

LEVEL 4

104

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

324
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

82

14%

LEVEL 2

200

33%

LEVEL 3

200

33%

LEVEL 4

124

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

236
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

44

11%

LEVEL 2

133

32%

LEVEL 3

136

33%

LEVEL 4

100

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

57

40%

LEVEL 2

56

39%

LEVEL 3

21

15%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

38

34%

LEVEL 2

41

36%

LEVEL 3

29

26%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.