Skip to Content
Main content

PINE PLAINS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

151

35%

LEVEL 2

167

39%

LEVEL 3

79

19%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

67

34%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

65

31%

LEVEL 2

99

47%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

31

33%

LEVEL 2

29

31%

LEVEL 3

30

32%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

86

40%

LEVEL 2

68

32%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

36

34%

LEVEL 2

37

35%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

116

32%

LEVEL 2

142

39%

LEVEL 3

77

21%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

41

27%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

47

31%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

8

89%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

20

47%

LEVEL 2

20

47%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

21

54%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

103

28%

LEVEL 2

157

43%

LEVEL 3

74

20%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

38

24%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

48

30%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

48

74%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

29

74%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

78

28%

LEVEL 2

111

40%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

30

25%

LEVEL 2

38

32%

LEVEL 3

36

30%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

73

50%

LEVEL 2

56

38%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

37

47%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

109
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

149

35%

LEVEL 2

164

39%

LEVEL 3

79

19%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.