Skip to Content
Main content

ROMBOUT MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 577

LEVEL 1

238

41%

LEVEL 2

239

41%

LEVEL 3

71

12%

LEVEL 4

29

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

81

28%

LEVEL 2

113

40%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

116

40%

LEVEL 2

123

42%

LEVEL 3

36

12%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

35

23%

LEVEL 2

63

42%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

122

43%

LEVEL 2

116

40%

LEVEL 3

35

12%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

46

34%

LEVEL 2

50

37%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

73

30%

LEVEL 2

106

44%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

57
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

20

16%

LEVEL 2

49

39%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

25

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

68

52%

LEVEL 2

47

36%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

29

47%

LEVEL 2

23

37%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

90

49%

LEVEL 2

77

42%

LEVEL 3

10

5%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

30

36%

LEVEL 2

40

48%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

138

31%

LEVEL 2

216

48%

LEVEL 3

69

15%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

48

20%

LEVEL 2

102

42%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

100

80%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

33

73%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

68

26%

LEVEL 2

119

45%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

62

39%

LEVEL 3

39

25%

LEVEL 4

33

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

170

55%

LEVEL 2

120

39%

LEVEL 3

17

5%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

56

44%

LEVEL 2

51

40%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.