SIDNEY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

93

23%

LEVEL 2

159

39%

LEVEL 3

104

26%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

87

29%

LEVEL 2

94

31%

LEVEL 3

78

26%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

44

23%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

38

25%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

49

23%

LEVEL 2

84

40%

LEVEL 3

60

28%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

49

32%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

75%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

75

21%

LEVEL 2

141

40%

LEVEL 3

95

27%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

107
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

73

28%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

57

16%

LEVEL 2

154

43%

LEVEL 3

100

28%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

58

22%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

76

28%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

36

80%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

29

83%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

151
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

90

23%

LEVEL 2

158

40%

LEVEL 3

103

26%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

52

39%

LEVEL 4

27

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

27

21%

LEVEL 2

37

29%

LEVEL 3

41

32%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

79

29%

LEVEL 2

119

44%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

60

34%

LEVEL 2

57

32%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.