Skip to Content
Main content

GREENE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

104

22%

LEVEL 2

154

33%

LEVEL 3

155

33%

LEVEL 4

50

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

67

21%

LEVEL 2

113

36%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

39

17%

LEVEL 2

80

35%

LEVEL 3

83

36%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

62

41%

LEVEL 3

42

28%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

65

28%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

72

31%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

39

24%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

25

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

192
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

97

22%

LEVEL 2

148

34%

LEVEL 3

144

33%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

107

37%

LEVEL 3

81

28%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

47

13%

LEVEL 2

130

36%

LEVEL 3

139

38%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

98

39%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

43

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

57

59%

LEVEL 2

24

25%

LEVEL 3

16

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

38

61%

LEVEL 2

15

24%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

93

40%

LEVEL 4

41

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

54

35%

LEVEL 4

32

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

72

31%

LEVEL 2

87

38%

LEVEL 3

62

27%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

44

28%

LEVEL 2

66

42%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.