Skip to Content
Main content

THOMAS K BEECHER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

210

53%

LEVEL 2

131

33%

LEVEL 3

43

11%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

183

52%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

47

13%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

91

50%

LEVEL 2

66

36%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

87

49%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

119

56%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

96

54%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

22

63%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

23

56%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

45
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

110

48%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

41
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

101

47%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

69

63%

LEVEL 2

36

33%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

52

63%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

182

51%

LEVEL 2

123

35%

LEVEL 3

41

12%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

155

48%

LEVEL 2

113

35%

LEVEL 3

46

14%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

28

74%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

28

85%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

36

38%

LEVEL 2

40

43%

LEVEL 3

13

14%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

38

40%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

174

58%

LEVEL 2

91

30%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

145

56%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

24

9%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.