THOMAS JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

267

55%

LEVEL 2

138

28%

LEVEL 3

65

13%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

243

53%

LEVEL 2

140

31%

LEVEL 3

53

12%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

121

52%

LEVEL 2

69

30%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

106

48%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

146

57%

LEVEL 2

69

27%

LEVEL 3

30

12%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

137

59%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

21

50%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

14

45%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

140

45%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

55

18%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

52
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

123

44%

LEVEL 2

106

38%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

95

81%

LEVEL 2

18

15%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

96

76%

LEVEL 2

21

17%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

206

49%

LEVEL 2

134

32%

LEVEL 3

65

15%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

183

48%

LEVEL 2

131

34%

LEVEL 3

52

14%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

61

94%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

60

86%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

81
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

196

47%

LEVEL 2

136

33%

LEVEL 3

65

16%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

72
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

172

45%

LEVEL 2

136

36%

LEVEL 3

53

14%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

71

97%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

71

95%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

52

39%

LEVEL 2

47

35%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

37

30%

LEVEL 2

54

44%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

215

61%

LEVEL 2

91

26%

LEVEL 3

40

11%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

206

62%

LEVEL 2

86

26%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.