Skip to Content
Main content

FALCONER CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

137

31%

LEVEL 2

171

39%

LEVEL 3

104

24%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

84

29%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

58

32%

LEVEL 2

77

42%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

33

27%

LEVEL 2

40

33%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

79

31%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

51

30%

LEVEL 2

62

37%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

129
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

122

29%

LEVEL 2

163

39%

LEVEL 3

102

25%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

77

28%

LEVEL 2

97

35%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

100

26%

LEVEL 2

163

42%

LEVEL 3

102

26%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

59

23%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

68

27%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

37

77%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

25

71%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

55

25%

LEVEL 2

88

40%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

50

38%

LEVEL 3

37

28%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

82

38%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

62

39%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.