Skip to Content
Main content

CHAUTAUQUA LAKE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

79

22%

LEVEL 2

141

40%

LEVEL 3

99

28%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

55

20%

LEVEL 2

116

43%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

34

21%

LEVEL 2

65

40%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

32

23%

LEVEL 2

58

41%

LEVEL 3

33

23%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

76

39%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

58

44%

LEVEL 3

31

24%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

73

22%

LEVEL 2

136

40%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

96
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

51

20%

LEVEL 2

109

43%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

136

43%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

106

44%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

34

85%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

20

65%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

29

15%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

62

32%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

22

16%

LEVEL 2

57

40%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

50

31%

LEVEL 2

66

40%

LEVEL 3

37

23%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

33

25%

LEVEL 2

59

45%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.