SALAMANCA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

234

46%

LEVEL 2

176

35%

LEVEL 3

78

15%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

198

49%

LEVEL 2

127

31%

LEVEL 3

59

15%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

104

44%

LEVEL 2

92

39%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

89

49%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

130

49%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

109

49%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

29
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

95

48%

LEVEL 2

76

38%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

30
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

92

52%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

130

47%

LEVEL 2

88

32%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

95

46%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

186

42%

LEVEL 2

166

37%

LEVEL 3

77

17%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

157

44%

LEVEL 2

118

33%

LEVEL 3

56

16%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

48

81%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

41

77%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

49

36%

LEVEL 2

48

35%

LEVEL 3

34

25%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

28

28%

LEVEL 2

40

40%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

185

50%

LEVEL 2

128

35%

LEVEL 3

44

12%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

170

56%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

37

12%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.