Skip to Content
Main content

ALLEGANY-LIMESTONE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

125

24%

LEVEL 2

195

37%

LEVEL 3

125

24%

LEVEL 4

85

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

114

24%

LEVEL 2

181

39%

LEVEL 3

114

24%

LEVEL 4

61

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

56

22%

LEVEL 2

95

37%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

51

22%

LEVEL 2

87

37%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

69

25%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

63

27%

LEVEL 2

94

40%

LEVEL 3

56

24%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

195
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

118

24%

LEVEL 2

185

37%

LEVEL 3

112

22%

LEVEL 4

83

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

102

23%

LEVEL 2

169

39%

LEVEL 3

110

25%

LEVEL 4

57

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

83

18%

LEVEL 2

177

38%

LEVEL 3

123

26%

LEVEL 4

83

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

78

19%

LEVEL 2

166

40%

LEVEL 3

110

27%

LEVEL 4

60

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

42

66%

LEVEL 2

18

28%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

36

64%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

63

18%

LEVEL 2

128

36%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

67

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

50

18%

LEVEL 2

102

36%

LEVEL 3

84

30%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

62

35%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

64

34%

LEVEL 2

79

42%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.