WINDSOR CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

297
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 683

LEVEL 1

106

16%

LEVEL 2

280

41%

LEVEL 3

197

29%

LEVEL 4

100

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 629

LEVEL 1

90

14%

LEVEL 2

241

38%

LEVEL 3

197

31%

LEVEL 4

101

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

133
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

62

19%

LEVEL 2

135

41%

LEVEL 3

95

29%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

52

16%

LEVEL 2

132

41%

LEVEL 3

97

30%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

164
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

44

12%

LEVEL 2

145

41%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

62

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

162
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

109

35%

LEVEL 3

100

32%

LEVEL 4

62

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

281
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 637

LEVEL 1

97

15%

LEVEL 2

259

41%

LEVEL 3

189

30%

LEVEL 4

92

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

280
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 577

LEVEL 1

77

13%

LEVEL 2

220

38%

LEVEL 3

186

32%

LEVEL 4

94

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

293
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

56

10%

LEVEL 2

236

40%

LEVEL 3

194

33%

LEVEL 4

99

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

46

9%

LEVEL 2

202

37%

LEVEL 3

191

35%

LEVEL 4

100

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

50

51%

LEVEL 2

44

45%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

44

49%

LEVEL 2

39

43%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

129

36%

LEVEL 3

123

34%

LEVEL 4

74

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

103

35%

LEVEL 3

114

39%

LEVEL 4

61

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

75

23%

LEVEL 2

151

46%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

74

22%

LEVEL 2

138

41%

LEVEL 3

83

25%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.