WHITNEY POINT CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 614

LEVEL 1

201

33%

LEVEL 2

217

35%

LEVEL 3

137

22%

LEVEL 4

59

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

132

30%

LEVEL 2

152

34%

LEVEL 3

108

24%

LEVEL 4

51

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

97

31%

LEVEL 2

113

36%

LEVEL 3

64

21%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

60

28%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

104

34%

LEVEL 2

104

34%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

72

32%

LEVEL 2

79

35%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

194
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 595

LEVEL 1

190

32%

LEVEL 2

211

35%

LEVEL 3

137

23%

LEVEL 4

57

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

156
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

124

29%

LEVEL 2

145

34%

LEVEL 3

105

25%

LEVEL 4

51

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

107

21%

LEVEL 2

199

40%

LEVEL 3

137

27%

LEVEL 4

59

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

81

22%

LEVEL 2

141

38%

LEVEL 3

105

28%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

94

84%

LEVEL 2

18

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

51

76%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

61

23%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

57

34%

LEVEL 3

54

33%

LEVEL 4

30

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

140

41%

LEVEL 2

129

37%

LEVEL 3

53

15%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

107

39%

LEVEL 2

95

34%

LEVEL 3

54

19%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.