Skip to Content
Main content

DEPOSIT CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

54

22%

LEVEL 2

110

45%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

49

21%

LEVEL 2

92

40%

LEVEL 3

63

28%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

28

22%

LEVEL 2

55

44%

LEVEL 3

33

26%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

19

17%

LEVEL 2

47

42%

LEVEL 3

31

28%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

26

22%

LEVEL 2

55

47%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

30

26%

LEVEL 2

45

39%

LEVEL 3

32

28%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

49

21%

LEVEL 2

105

46%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

48

22%

LEVEL 2

87

40%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

95

48%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

80

44%

LEVEL 3

61

34%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

27

61%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

33

69%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

12

16%

LEVEL 2

29

39%

LEVEL 3

26

35%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

8

12%

LEVEL 2

25

38%

LEVEL 3

22

34%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

42

25%

LEVEL 2

81

48%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

41

25%

LEVEL 2

67

41%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.