MAINE-ENDWELL CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

475
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,051

LEVEL 1

238

23%

LEVEL 2

338

32%

LEVEL 3

314

30%

LEVEL 4

161

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

456
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 906

LEVEL 1

178

20%

LEVEL 2

272

30%

LEVEL 3

281

31%

LEVEL 4

175

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

233
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

114

22%

LEVEL 2

171

33%

LEVEL 3

162

31%

LEVEL 4

71

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

226
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

93

21%

LEVEL 2

134

30%

LEVEL 3

150

33%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

242
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

124

23%

LEVEL 2

167

31%

LEVEL 3

152

29%

LEVEL 4

90

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

230
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

85

19%

LEVEL 2

138

30%

LEVEL 3

131

29%

LEVEL 4

99

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

454
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 969

LEVEL 1

208

21%

LEVEL 2

307

32%

LEVEL 3

300

31%

LEVEL 4

154

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

430
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 823

LEVEL 1

148

18%

LEVEL 2

245

30%

LEVEL 3

262

32%

LEVEL 4

168

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

11

38%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

11

52%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

458
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 843

LEVEL 1

94

11%

LEVEL 2

291

35%

LEVEL 3

299

35%

LEVEL 4

159

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

432
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 715

LEVEL 1

58

8%

LEVEL 2

225

31%

LEVEL 3

264

37%

LEVEL 4

168

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

144

69%

LEVEL 2

47

23%

LEVEL 3

15

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

120

63%

LEVEL 2

47

25%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

370
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 663

LEVEL 1

96

14%

LEVEL 2

197

30%

LEVEL 3

233

35%

LEVEL 4

137

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

342
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 577

LEVEL 1

71

12%

LEVEL 2

164

28%

LEVEL 3

193

33%

LEVEL 4

149

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

142

37%

LEVEL 2

141

36%

LEVEL 3

81

21%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

107

33%

LEVEL 2

108

33%

LEVEL 3

88

27%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.