Skip to Content
Main content

CHENANGO VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 705

LEVEL 1

166

24%

LEVEL 2

274

39%

LEVEL 3

166

24%

LEVEL 4

99

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

118

21%

LEVEL 2

168

31%

LEVEL 3

167

30%

LEVEL 4

96

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

77

22%

LEVEL 2

151

43%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

44

17%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

48

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

145
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

89

25%

LEVEL 2

123

34%

LEVEL 3

93

26%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

138
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

74

25%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

90

30%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

10

48%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

250
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 645

LEVEL 1

148

23%

LEVEL 2

247

38%

LEVEL 3

157

24%

LEVEL 4

93

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

249
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

105

21%

LEVEL 2

151

30%

LEVEL 3

156

31%

LEVEL 4

93

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

8

62%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 594

LEVEL 1

89

15%

LEVEL 2

247

42%

LEVEL 3

161

27%

LEVEL 4

97

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

56

12%

LEVEL 2

147

32%

LEVEL 3

160

35%

LEVEL 4

95

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

77

69%

LEVEL 2

27

24%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

62

68%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

200
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

58

13%

LEVEL 2

178

41%

LEVEL 3

127

29%

LEVEL 4

73

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

196
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

104

31%

LEVEL 3

120

36%

LEVEL 4

76

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

108

40%

LEVEL 2

96

36%

LEVEL 3

39

14%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

80

38%

LEVEL 2

64

30%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.