Skip to Content
Main content

HARPURSVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

143

38%

LEVEL 2

132

35%

LEVEL 3

77

20%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

79

32%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

69

39%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

36

31%

LEVEL 2

41

35%

LEVEL 3

32

27%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

74

37%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

43

33%

LEVEL 2

42

33%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

137

38%

LEVEL 2

126

35%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

75

32%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

56

24%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

81

27%

LEVEL 2

124

41%

LEVEL 3

75

25%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

44

22%

LEVEL 2

72

36%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

62

86%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

35

71%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

40

34%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

22

22%

LEVEL 2

30

30%

LEVEL 3

29

29%

LEVEL 4

18

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

103

40%

LEVEL 2

93

36%

LEVEL 3

51

20%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

57

39%

LEVEL 2

53

36%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.