Skip to Content
Main content

VOORHEESVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

57

21%

LEVEL 3

94

35%

LEVEL 4

102

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

39

19%

LEVEL 3

81

39%

LEVEL 4

70

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

29

23%

LEVEL 3

43

34%

LEVEL 4

49

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

41

38%

LEVEL 4

37

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

28

20%

LEVEL 3

51

36%

LEVEL 4

53

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

40

39%

LEVEL 4

33

32%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

6

75%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

54

22%

LEVEL 3

89

36%

LEVEL 4

90

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

70

38%

LEVEL 4

60

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

51

21%

LEVEL 3

87

36%

LEVEL 4

100

41%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

36

19%

LEVEL 3

79

41%

LEVEL 4

70

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

12

71%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

183
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

47

20%

LEVEL 3

81

34%

LEVEL 4

102

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

31

16%

LEVEL 3

75

40%

LEVEL 4

69

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

13

46%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.