Skip to Content
Main content

RAVENA-COEYMANS-SELKIRK MID SCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

102

27%

LEVEL 2

161

42%

LEVEL 3

88

23%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

39

22%

LEVEL 2

80

44%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

48

24%

LEVEL 2

94

46%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

46

49%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

54

30%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

27

31%

LEVEL 2

34

39%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

107
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

79

24%

LEVEL 2

139

43%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

31

21%

LEVEL 2

65

43%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

56

17%

LEVEL 2

154

47%

LEVEL 3

87

27%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

74

49%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

46

84%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

25

81%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

39

18%

LEVEL 2

94

42%

LEVEL 3

63

28%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

50

45%

LEVEL 3

31

28%

LEVEL 4

18

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

63

40%

LEVEL 2

67

42%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

28

39%

LEVEL 2

30

42%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.