Skip to Content
Main content

CLEVELAND HILL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

100

34%

LEVEL 2

145

49%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

110

41%

LEVEL 2

111

41%

LEVEL 3

34

13%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

50

35%

LEVEL 2

66

46%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

53

39%

LEVEL 2

55

40%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

50

32%

LEVEL 2

79

51%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

57

43%

LEVEL 2

56

42%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

38
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

38

23%

LEVEL 2

86

53%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

35
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

39

27%

LEVEL 2

68

48%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

46

47%

LEVEL 2

41

42%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

52

56%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

63

26%

LEVEL 2

131

53%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

76

33%

LEVEL 2

102

45%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

37

71%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

34

79%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

28

23%

LEVEL 2

64

52%

LEVEL 3

27

22%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

36

33%

LEVEL 2

48

44%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

72

41%

LEVEL 2

81

46%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

74

46%

LEVEL 2

63

39%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.