BRONX PREP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

89

28%

LEVEL 2

148

46%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

170

39%

LEVEL 2

158

36%

LEVEL 3

77

18%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

42

24%

LEVEL 2

85

48%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

86

36%

LEVEL 2

90

38%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

47

32%

LEVEL 2

63

43%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

84

42%

LEVEL 2

68

34%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

45

30%

LEVEL 2

65

43%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

51
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

93

42%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

44

27%

LEVEL 2

79

49%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

76

37%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

45

22%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

70

24%

LEVEL 2

140

48%

LEVEL 3

69

24%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

121

32%

LEVEL 2

150

40%

LEVEL 3

71

19%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

19

66%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

49

77%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

84
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

69

23%

LEVEL 2

144

48%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

108
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

149

37%

LEVEL 2

150

37%

LEVEL 3

76

19%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

20

83%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

21

70%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

13

29%

LEVEL 2

22

49%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

14

33%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

76

28%

LEVEL 2

126

46%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

156

40%

LEVEL 2

141

36%

LEVEL 3

70

18%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.