Skip to Content
Main content

CHENANGO VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

75

31%

LEVEL 2

119

49%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

41

28%

LEVEL 2

56

38%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

38

28%

LEVEL 2

71

53%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

20

25%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

12

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

37

35%

LEVEL 2

48

45%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

21

31%

LEVEL 2

26

38%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

9

75%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

45
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

67

31%

LEVEL 2

107

49%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

37

27%

LEVEL 2

51

38%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

48

24%

LEVEL 2

108

53%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

21

19%

LEVEL 2

46

41%

LEVEL 3

26

23%

LEVEL 4

20

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

27

68%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

20

59%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

29

21%

LEVEL 2

76

54%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

16

17%

LEVEL 2

36

39%

LEVEL 3

23

25%

LEVEL 4

17

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

46

46%

LEVEL 2

43

43%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

25

45%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.