Skip to Content
Main content

MS 302 LUISA DESSUS CRUZ GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

339

60%

LEVEL 2

149

26%

LEVEL 3

53

9%

LEVEL 4

24

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

315

61%

LEVEL 2

140

27%

LEVEL 3

45

9%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

154

57%

LEVEL 2

71

26%

LEVEL 3

33

12%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

147

60%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

24

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

185

63%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

20

7%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

168

62%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

21

8%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

86

63%

LEVEL 2

31

23%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

68

63%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

247

59%

LEVEL 2

116

28%

LEVEL 3

35

8%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

46
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

242

62%

LEVEL 2

104

27%

LEVEL 3

33

8%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

230

54%

LEVEL 2

124

29%

LEVEL 3

50

12%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

213

54%

LEVEL 2

122

31%

LEVEL 3

43

11%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

109

78%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

102

83%

LEVEL 2

18

15%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

75
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

231

53%

LEVEL 2

128

29%

LEVEL 3

51

12%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

56
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

198

52%

LEVEL 2

124

33%

LEVEL 3

42

11%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

108

82%

LEVEL 2

21

16%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

117

85%

LEVEL 2

16

12%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

15

68%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

324

60%

LEVEL 2

143

26%

LEVEL 3

53

10%

LEVEL 4

23

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

306

61%

LEVEL 2

137

27%

LEVEL 3

42

8%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.