Skip to Content
Main content

DANA L LYON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

135

28%

LEVEL 2

203

42%

LEVEL 3

121

25%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

63

28%

LEVEL 2

92

41%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

64

28%

LEVEL 2

96

42%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

29

23%

LEVEL 2

55

44%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

71

28%

LEVEL 2

107

42%

LEVEL 3

68

27%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

34

35%

LEVEL 2

37

38%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

142
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

128

27%

LEVEL 2

196

42%

LEVEL 3

118

25%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

66
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

61

28%

LEVEL 2

88

41%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

82

20%

LEVEL 2

181

45%

LEVEL 3

116

29%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

38

20%

LEVEL 2

86

45%

LEVEL 3

46

24%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

53

66%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

25

78%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

32

15%

LEVEL 2

93

45%

LEVEL 3

68

33%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

14

17%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

29

35%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

103

37%

LEVEL 2

110

40%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

49

36%

LEVEL 2

63

46%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.