Skip to Content
Main content

BROOKLYN EXCELSIOR CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

189

42%

LEVEL 2

148

33%

LEVEL 3

83

18%

LEVEL 4

34

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

206

45%

LEVEL 2

167

36%

LEVEL 3

72

16%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

103

43%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

98

43%

LEVEL 2

95

41%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

86

40%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

108

47%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

99
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

166

41%

LEVEL 2

138

34%

LEVEL 3

72

18%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

68
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

182

46%

LEVEL 2

145

37%

LEVEL 3

58

15%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

15

44%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

16

35%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

144

37%

LEVEL 2

132

34%

LEVEL 3

78

20%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

151

38%

LEVEL 2

156

40%

LEVEL 3

71

18%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

45

68%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

55

82%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

87
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

200

44%

LEVEL 2

166

37%

LEVEL 3

72

16%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

17

33%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

18

33%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

12

22%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

172

43%

LEVEL 2

132

33%

LEVEL 3

74

18%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

188

46%

LEVEL 2

146

36%

LEVEL 3

60

15%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.