KIPP STAR COLLEGE PREP CHARTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

106

33%

LEVEL 2

120

37%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

78

23%

LEVEL 2

112

34%

LEVEL 3

110

33%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

44

28%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

44

28%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

36

21%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

61

36%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

62

37%

LEVEL 2

64

38%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

42

25%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

47
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

67

36%

LEVEL 2

70

38%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

78
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

45

25%

LEVEL 2

60

33%

LEVEL 3

61

33%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

39

29%

LEVEL 2

47

35%

LEVEL 3

35

26%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

33

23%

LEVEL 2

48

33%

LEVEL 3

48

33%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

53

22%

LEVEL 2

99

40%

LEVEL 3

68

28%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

95

39%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

53

65%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

48

55%

LEVEL 2

23

26%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

99
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

96

31%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

140
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

67

22%

LEVEL 2

104

33%

LEVEL 3

107

34%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

10

33%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

12

26%

LEVEL 2

17

37%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

96

32%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

66

23%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

98

34%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.