Skip to Content
Main content

EXCELLENCE BOYS CS-BEDFORD STUY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

46

13%

LEVEL 2

111

32%

LEVEL 3

105

30%

LEVEL 4

89

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

93

25%

LEVEL 3

114

31%

LEVEL 4

115

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MALE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MALE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

6

75%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

178
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

98

30%

LEVEL 4

80

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

205
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

45

13%

LEVEL 2

91

27%

LEVEL 3

102

30%

LEVEL 4

103

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

84

28%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

73

24%

LEVEL 3

99

33%

LEVEL 4

103

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

22

39%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

23

33%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

12

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

28

28%

LEVEL 3

32

32%

LEVEL 4

29

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

19

18%

LEVEL 3

33

32%

LEVEL 4

38

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

36

14%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

73

29%

LEVEL 4

60

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

158
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

77

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.