Skip to Content
Main content

NEW VOICES SCH-ACAD & CREATIVE ARTS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

50

12%

LEVEL 2

172

40%

LEVEL 3

136

31%

LEVEL 4

74

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

42

11%

LEVEL 2

143

36%

LEVEL 3

141

36%

LEVEL 4

70

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

120

41%

LEVEL 3

91

31%

LEVEL 4

50

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

106

39%

LEVEL 3

92

34%

LEVEL 4

45

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

52

38%

LEVEL 3

45

33%

LEVEL 4

24

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

37

29%

LEVEL 3

49

39%

LEVEL 4

25

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

8

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

55

38%

LEVEL 3

48

33%

LEVEL 4

30

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

55

38%

LEVEL 4

37

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

9

14%

LEVEL 2

21

33%

LEVEL 3

25

39%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

28

44%

LEVEL 3

21

33%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

81
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

88

45%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

81
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

66

40%

LEVEL 3

61

37%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

137

39%

LEVEL 3

128

36%

LEVEL 4

71

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

113

35%

LEVEL 3

129

40%

LEVEL 4

67

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

33

42%

LEVEL 2

35

44%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

31

41%

LEVEL 2

30

39%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

209
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

42

10%

LEVEL 2

171

41%

LEVEL 3

135

32%

LEVEL 4

74

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

211
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

141

36%

LEVEL 3

141

36%

LEVEL 4

70

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

71

39%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

32

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

79

33%

LEVEL 3

88

37%

LEVEL 4

49

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

101

40%

LEVEL 3

80

32%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

64

40%

LEVEL 3

53

33%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.