Skip to Content
Main content

CANISTEO-GREENWOOD CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

143

37%

LEVEL 2

148

38%

LEVEL 3

68

17%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

82

23%

LEVEL 2

151

43%

LEVEL 3

86

24%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

78

41%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

36

19%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

35

22%

LEVEL 2

72

44%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

65

32%

LEVEL 2

86

43%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

47

24%

LEVEL 2

79

41%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

134

36%

LEVEL 2

144

38%

LEVEL 3

68

18%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

81

23%

LEVEL 2

145

42%

LEVEL 3

85

24%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

103

31%

LEVEL 2

135

40%

LEVEL 3

68

20%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

137

45%

LEVEL 3

83

27%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

40

75%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

33

66%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

48

27%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

40

23%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

64

42%

LEVEL 3

47

31%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

95

45%

LEVEL 2

80

38%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

60

29%

LEVEL 2

87

43%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.