Skip to Content
Main content

TAG YOUNG SCHOLARS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

307
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

38

11%

LEVEL 3

86

25%

LEVEL 4

221

64%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

299
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

16

5%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

229

73%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

165
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

23

12%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

112

60%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

160
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

6%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

116

68%

MALE

PROFICIENT

142
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

15

9%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

109

69%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

113

78%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

109
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

102

93%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

101
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

93

92%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

19
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

15

75%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

34

92%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

103
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

49

39%

LEVEL 4

54

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

86
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

11%

LEVEL 3

34

35%

LEVEL 4

52

54%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

24

29%

LEVEL 4

47

56%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

25

36%

LEVEL 4

41

59%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

295
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

14

5%

LEVEL 3

68

22%

LEVEL 4

227

73%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

15

11%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

97

69%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

3%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

109

78%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

182
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

58

28%

LEVEL 4

124

60%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

7%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

120

69%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.