Skip to Content
Main content

KIPP INFINITY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

41

9%

LEVEL 2

140

31%

LEVEL 3

160

36%

LEVEL 4

105

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

335
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

73

13%

LEVEL 2

137

25%

LEVEL 3

177

32%

LEVEL 4

158

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

74

32%

LEVEL 4

53

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

174
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

78

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

138
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

86

40%

LEVEL 4

52

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

161
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

40

15%

LEVEL 2

64

24%

LEVEL 3

81

31%

LEVEL 4

80

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

64
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

45

35%

LEVEL 3

39

31%

LEVEL 4

25

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

78
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

34

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

197
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

94

30%

LEVEL 3

120

38%

LEVEL 4

77

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

252
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

86

22%

LEVEL 3

131

34%

LEVEL 4

121

32%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

101

28%

LEVEL 3

145

41%

LEVEL 4

94

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

289
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

93

22%

LEVEL 3

147

36%

LEVEL 4

142

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

24

27%

LEVEL 2

39

44%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

46
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

41

31%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

30

23%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

248
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

35

9%

LEVEL 2

117

29%

LEVEL 3

149

37%

LEVEL 4

99

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

313
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

60

12%

LEVEL 2

121

24%

LEVEL 3

159

32%

LEVEL 4

154

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

17
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

23

50%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

22
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

13

25%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

18

35%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

14

39%

LEVEL 3

14

39%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

15

29%

LEVEL 4

19

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

245
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

39

10%

LEVEL 2

126

31%

LEVEL 3

146

36%

LEVEL 4

99

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

301
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

67

14%

LEVEL 2

125

25%

LEVEL 3

162

33%

LEVEL 4

139

28%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.