Skip to Content
Main content

WILLIAMSBURG COLLEGIATE CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

83

26%

LEVEL 3

144

46%

LEVEL 4

69

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

72

29%

LEVEL 3

99

40%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

43

26%

LEVEL 3

74

45%

LEVEL 4

35

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

25

19%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

47

36%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

70

46%

LEVEL 4

34

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

17

14%

LEVEL 2

34

29%

LEVEL 3

52

44%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

60
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

34

33%

LEVEL 3

44

42%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

149
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

46

23%

LEVEL 3

97

48%

LEVEL 4

52

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

95
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

69

42%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

63

23%

LEVEL 3

132

48%

LEVEL 4

67

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

88

45%

LEVEL 4

35

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

20

49%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

19

36%

LEVEL 2

22

42%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

205
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

137

46%

LEVEL 4

68

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

132
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

34

15%

LEVEL 2

65

28%

LEVEL 3

96

42%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

17

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

15

38%

LEVEL 4

8

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

181
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

70

26%

LEVEL 3

129

48%

LEVEL 4

52

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

84

40%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.